eClerx Services Moat Analysis: Score & Risks
eClerx Services Ltd.
A first-pass moat teardown of eClerx Services Ltd., built from single-pass filing evidence. Free note — provisional, and the full two-pass deep dive may revise it.
First-pass narrow read — primary edge in Efficient Scale. Provisional, single-pass evidence.
eClerx Services Ltd. scores 4.76 on MoatSCORE 6.0 — a narrow moat in Services. This is a first-pass note: the dimensional read and the filing receipts below come from a single GFIP evidence pass, not the full two-pass deep corpus behind our flagship deep dives. Provisional — published free while the deep version is queued.
Seven dimensions of moat
Ordered by contribution. Each dimension carries a verified filing quote, graded [M] mechanism or [O] outcome.
“It's about 70% on annuity and 30% is discretionary.”
“We will leverage the new delivery centers to grow footprint with both existing and new clients.”
“Margins have shown a strong sequential improvement as well. This is attributable to three key reasons, strong revenue growth, improved utilization and some one-offs”
“Attrition is marginally up from the previous quarter”
“The Personiv brand continues to carry strong recall among SMBs seeking F&A automation.”
D8 rating: ADEQUATE. Not part of the moat score — it governs the cost of equity and the fade window. First-pass; not yet deep-reviewed.
The barrier gate — first-pass
Effective barrier 5 — below 6, so the band is capped narrow. First-pass estimate.
Deep two-pass review. This draft rests on a single GFIP evidence pass; the full 10-year AR + concall corpus may move the read.
The barrier gate. A firmer replication or bypass estimate is the most likely thing to shift the band.
Adverse events. Any governance, regulatory or funding shock captured in D8 could re-rate the fade window.
Where this note fits. This company is one of 509 Indian companies we have scored for moat durability — 370 narrow, 126 narrow-trending-wide, none wide. Every score, dimension by dimension, is free in the Moat Screener.
Member discussion