3 min read

Suryoday's Bad Loans Fell to 2.9%. Here's the ₹591 Crore Behind It.

Suryoday SFB's GNPA fell from 6.5% to 2.9% in a quarter, after a ₹591 crore write-off. Without it, our estimate is about 6.6%. What the filing says.

Suryoday Small Finance Bank says its gross bad loans fell to 2.9% of its book at the end of September, from 6.5% in June and 9.3% a year ago. The same filing says its loan book is shown "after considering a write-off of ₹591 Crore". Put the write-off back, and our estimate of the bad-loan ratio is about 6.6%, roughly where it was in June.

What the filing says

From Suryoday's Q2 update ([SSFB]), ₹ crore:

Q2 FY27 Q1 FY27 Q2 FY26
Gross advances (incl. IBPC) 14,972 14,376 11,124
Total deposits 16,184 14,634 11,991
Bulk deposits 2,514 1,852 1,675
CASA ratio 19.4% 21.0% 20.7%
GNPA ratio 2.9% 6.5% 9.3%

And at 30 September:

₹ crore
GNPA 438.31
Provisions 135.77
NNPA 224.51
Balance claimable under CGFMU (a government credit guarantee) 180.00

The arithmetic both ways

Our arithmetic, on the filed figures:

  • As reported: GNPA ₹438 crore on a ₹14,972 crore book, the bank's 2.9%.
  • With the write-off added back: if the whole ₹591 crore was bad loans, GNPA would be about ₹1,029 crore on a ₹15,563 crore book. That is about 6.6%.
  • Against June: the ratio was 6.5% then. On this estimate, the underlying bad-loan level barely moved; the write-off did the work.

The filing doesn't say which loans were written off, so this is an estimate.

Two more numbers worth a look

  • Thin provisions. Provisions of ₹135.77 crore cover 31% of GNPA (our arithmetic). The bank leans on the credit guarantee too: ₹180 crore is still "Claimable under CGFMU".
  • NNPA doesn't add up. GNPA minus provisions is ₹302.54 crore, but NNPA is shown as ₹224.51 crore. The filing doesn't explain the ₹78 crore gap; guarantee claims may be netted, but it doesn't say.

Three small finance banks, three routes

Q2 filings from three small finance banks show three different paths on bad loans:

Bank Bad-loan ratio Write-offs in Q2 What drove the change
Ujjivan ([UJJ]) 2.17% → 2.10% ₹43 crore (₹213 crore a year ago) not write-offs, which fell
ESAF ([ESAF]) not given ₹625 crore technical write-off the bank presents it as a drag on loan growth
Suryoday ([SSFB]) 6.5% → 2.9% ₹591 crore most of the fall, on our estimate

Write-off definitions can differ between banks.

Moat and margin

Focus moat: cost advantage in underwriting. A small finance bank's edge is lending to small borrowers profitably. Over time, that shows up as low credit costs. One quarter's ratio after a large write-off doesn't show it either way.

The margin side. The write-off, provisions and any guarantee recoveries will run through Q2 profit. The update gives no P&L figures. Two more points from the same filing:

  • Deposits grew 35% in a year, and bulk deposits jumped 35.7% in the quarter.
  • CASA fell to 19.4% of deposits.

MoatSCORE: not yet scored. Suryoday is not on the Moat Screener ([MS]).

The bear case

  • Cosmetic improvement. On our estimate, the underlying bad-loan ratio is still about 6.6%.
  • Thin cover. Provisions cover 31% of GNPA, with guarantee claims of ₹180 crore still pending.
  • Costlier funding. Bulk deposits up 35.7% in a quarter; CASA ratio down.

The case for

  • Clean-up done. A large write-off resets the book; collection efficiency in the current bucket is 99.1%.
  • Guarantee cover. The bank says it covers eligible loans under the government's credit guarantee scheme.
  • Growth. Gross advances +34.6% and deposits +35% in a year.

What to watch

  1. Q2 results: credit cost, provisions and guarantee recoveries in the P&L.
  2. The GNPA ratio in December, with no further large write-off.
  3. CGFMU claims received against the ₹180 crore claimable.

Sources


Educational research, not investment advice. Every figure above is drawn from the banks' own filings, read from the primary documents on 6 October 2026; derived figures, including the "write-off added back" estimate, are our arithmetic and are labelled. Suryoday is not yet scored on the Moat Screener. No buy/sell recommendations, no price targets, no share prices. Moat & Margin is not a SEBI-registered Research Analyst or Investment Adviser.